Verilog problems / Combinational Design
What you must build
Compute all four carries in parallel from generate/propagate signals instead of rippling them one bit at a time — the classic fix for ripple-carry's O(N) delay.
Engineers use “4-Bit Carry Lookahead Adder” as a building block in combinational design. Interviewers ask for the same ports and the same corner cases this judge covers. Completing it in the browser is the same skill as writing synthesizable RTL at work, minus the EDA license.
g=a&b (this bit always produces a carry) and propagate p=a^b (this bit passes an incoming carry through). Each carry c[i+1] = g[i] | (p[i]&c[i]) can be expanded algebraically into a flat OR-of-ANDs expression depending only on the original a/b bits and cin — computable in parallel, not sequentially.Port contract
The judge instantiates exactly these ports. Extra ports or a different module name fail to elaborate.
| Name | Dir | Width | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| a | input | 4 | First operand |
| b | input | 4 | Second operand |
| cin | input | 1 | Carry in |
| sum | output | 4 | a + b + cin, low 4 bits |
| cout | output | 1 | Carry out |
How to approach this kata
This is a hard kata. Sketch the state bits and the illegal overlaps (full/empty, wrap, simultaneous enable) on paper first. A design that “usually works” in your head will fail a directed corner in the hidden tests.
Hidden tests instantiate top_module, drive the ports, and compare every sample against a golden model. They do not grade coding style. They do grade X/Z, off-by-one counters, and ignoring enables. Sign in only when you want the run saved on the leaderboard — the specification below is public.
Starter shape
Copy this skeleton into the editor (or press Reset starter). Fill the body; do not rename the module.
module top_module( input [3:0] a, input [3:0] b, input cin, output [3:0] sum, output cout ); // Your code here — compute g[i]=a[i]&b[i], p[i]=a[i]^b[i], then expand each carry from g/p/cin directly (no rippling). endmodule
Why this shows up in interviews
4-Bit Carry Lookahead Adder sits under Combinational Design (combinational, arithmetic). Concept: For each bit, define generate g=a&b (this bit always produces a carry) and propagate p=a^b (this bit passes an incoming carry through). Each carry c[i+1] = g[i] | (p[i]&c[i]) can be expanded algebraically into a flat OR-of-ANDs expression depending only on the original a/b bits and cin — computable in parallel, not sequentially.
A passing solution is synthesizable intent: no delays in the DUT, no initial blocks inside top_module, and no reference to testbench tasks. Use blocking assignments only in combinational always blocks; use non-blocking for registers clocked by clk.
Related problems
- 2-to-1 Multiplexer — Select between two 1-bit inputs using sel. When sel=0 output a; when sel=1 output b.
- 1-Bit Full Adder — Compute sum and carry-out for a + b + cin.
- 4-to-1 Multiplexer — Select one of four 1-bit inputs using a 2-bit sel. sel=00→in0, 01→in1, 10→in2, 11→in3.
- 4-to-2 Priority Encoder — Output the index of the highest-priority (MSB-most) set bit in a 4-bit input, plus a valid flag when any bit is set.
FAQ
What does this problem require?
What does the 4-Bit Carry Lookahead Adder problem ask for? Compute all four carries in parallel from generate/propagate signals instead of rippling them one bit at a time — the classic fix for ripple-carry's O(N) delay. Implement it as Verilog module top_module with the listed ports.
Combinational or sequential?
Is 4-Bit Carry Lookahead Adder combinational or sequential? Tags: combinational, arithmetic. Follow the clock/reset ports if they appear in the table; if there is no clock, use continuous assignment or combinational always @(*).
How does the auto-grader work?
How is 4-Bit Carry Lookahead Adder graded? A hidden SystemVerilog/Verilog testbench in the EcrioniX judge simulates your module in the browser. You pass when every directed vector matches, including the waveform contract shown on this page.