Verilog problems / Combinational Design
What you must build
Recompute the CRC-4 remainder of a received message and compare it against the appended CRC field to flag transmission errors.
Engineers use “CRC-4 Checker” as a building block in combinational design. Interviewers ask for the same ports and the same corner cases this judge covers. Completing it in the browser is the same skill as writing synthesizable RTL at work, minus the EDA license.
error = (crc_in != compute_crc(data)). Getting the comparison backwards — flagging error when the CRCs match — silently accepts every corrupted frame and rejects every good one, which is far more dangerous than no checking at all.Port contract
The judge instantiates exactly these ports. Extra ports or a different module name fail to elaborate.
| Name | Dir | Width | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | input | 8 | Received message byte |
| crc_in | input | 4 | Received CRC-4 field |
| error | output | 1 | 1 when the recomputed CRC doesn't match crc_in |
How to approach this kata
This is a hard kata. Sketch the state bits and the illegal overlaps (full/empty, wrap, simultaneous enable) on paper first. A design that “usually works” in your head will fail a directed corner in the hidden tests.
Hidden tests instantiate top_module, drive the ports, and compare every sample against a golden model. They do not grade coding style. They do grade X/Z, off-by-one counters, and ignoring enables. Sign in only when you want the run saved on the leaderboard — the specification below is public.
Starter shape
Copy this skeleton into the editor (or press Reset starter). Fill the body; do not rename the module.
module top_module( input [7:0] data, input [3:0] crc_in, output error ); // Your code here — recompute CRC-4 (poly x^4+x+1) over data, error = (crc_in != recomputed). endmodule
Why this shows up in interviews
CRC-4 Checker sits under Combinational Design (combinational, protocol). Concept: A receiver validates a frame by running the exact same CRC-4 algorithm the sender used and comparing results: error = (crc_in != compute_crc(data)) . Getting the comparison backwards — flagging error when the CRCs match — silently accepts every corrupted frame and rejects every good one, which is far more dangerous than no checking at all.
A passing solution is synthesizable intent: no delays in the DUT, no initial blocks inside top_module, and no reference to testbench tasks. Use blocking assignments only in combinational always blocks; use non-blocking for registers clocked by clk.
Related problems
- 2-to-1 Multiplexer — Select between two 1-bit inputs using sel. When sel=0 output a; when sel=1 output b.
- 1-Bit Full Adder — Compute sum and carry-out for a + b + cin.
- 4-to-1 Multiplexer — Select one of four 1-bit inputs using a 2-bit sel. sel=00→in0, 01→in1, 10→in2, 11→in3.
- 4-to-2 Priority Encoder — Output the index of the highest-priority (MSB-most) set bit in a 4-bit input, plus a valid flag when any bit is set.
FAQ
What does this problem require?
What does the CRC-4 Checker problem ask for? Recompute the CRC-4 remainder of a received message and compare it against the appended CRC field to flag transmission errors. Implement it as Verilog module top_module with the listed ports.
Combinational or sequential?
Is CRC-4 Checker combinational or sequential? Tags: combinational, protocol. Follow the clock/reset ports if they appear in the table; if there is no clock, use continuous assignment or combinational always @(*).
How does the auto-grader work?
How is CRC-4 Checker graded? A hidden SystemVerilog/Verilog testbench in the EcrioniX judge simulates your module in the browser. You pass when every directed vector matches, including the waveform contract shown on this page.